#WHO WAS WINSTON CHURCHILL IMPORTANT FULL#

But there had been a revolt, a parliamentary revolt, in which Chamberlain was essentially thrown out of office.

#WHO WAS WINSTON CHURCHILL IMPORTANT FULL#

He was deemed to be somewhat erratic and full of energy directed in all directions, as one of his ministers said.

He was, at the time, actually, perceived to be by many to be an unwelcome candidate for the job. He became prime minister on May 10, 1940. What circumstances led to him being named prime minister then? That's leadership.ĭAVIES: We'll talk more about that as we go through this. And then he would end his speeches invariably with a rhetorical flourish that would metaphorically - or, perhaps, even literally - metaphorically, though, bring listeners out of their seats just feeling like they, too, were emboldened and they were ready to do whatever was next. He would follow with cause for optimism - rational, realistic cause for optimism - not happy talk, but a real, rational appraisal. He would state as frankly as he could what was actually happening.

What Churchill would do is he would - first of all, he would begin with an assessment, a sober assessment, of what the - of the reality of the threat.

But when you look at his speeches, there is a structure that really works very well, I think, in a time of crisis like ours. And I'm not just saying in terms of being able to craft a terrific line. But above all, he was particularly good at - obviously, at delivering speeches. He understood the importance of being and seeming brave and wise and so forth. I certainly hope so.īut when I think about Churchill and I think about how he would've negotiated the situation - he understood the power, first of all, of symbolic acts. And I'm really startled, actually, at the lack of competent, wise national leadership, but maybe it'll come. I think a lot, actually, about how Churchill might have confronted this situation that we're in now - very differently than what we've seen thus far, honestly. I don't want to emphasize the parallels too much between what Churchill confronted at the time and what we're confronting now. What makes an effective leader in a time of crisis? And I just wonder if, as you've seen the coronavirus pandemic unfold and we've all watched our leaders try to handle it, you thought about Churchill and insights you might have gleaned into.

Well, Erik Larson, welcome back to FRESH AIR.ĭAVIES: This is a story about a leader at a time of national crisis. His new book is 'The Splendid And The Vile: A Saga Of Churchill, Family, And Defiance During The Blitz.' Like Terry, I'm working from home these days. Erik Larson has written seven previous books. Larson's book focuses on Churchill's first year in office from May of 1940 to May of 1941, a time when France had fallen to the Nazis, the United States had not yet entered the war and Hitler was determined to break the will of the British people with a ferocious bombing campaign that killed more than 44,000 civilians. Our guest today, author Erik Larson, has a new book about one of the most renowned leaders of the 20th century, British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, and his leadership during some of the darkest hours of World War II. As the coronavirus pandemic spreads, Americans and citizens of many countries are getting a new look at their national leaders, evaluating their performance in a moment of crisis. I'm Dave Davies filling in today for Terry Gross.

Who was winston churchill important